Friday, April 26, 2024

A Patent-Contesting, Animal Loving Submission to the Appeals Court

Since I got home, researchers from 15 nations have supported my appeal with supplementary evidence. This is just one!

Switzerland is a beautiful place look at the mountains and this was the view from France!

 

 This notice is in relation to count 15 in the application for appeal: The exploitation of animals and use of so-called animal "by-products":


I am grateful to the honourable court for considering the appeal entered against the men and women acting as directors, delegates, and agents of the WHO, UN and WEF. 

 The following supplementary evidence, of legal proceedings, supports the claim that the appeal should extend beyond genocide to faunicide (the killing of animals) and ecocide (wilful destruction of the  environment).

Jurisdiction
I write on behalf of the men and women and all sentient beings that have not been able to hold corporations, governments or even individual humans accountable through lawful, legal or political process or through public censure; who cannot donate, and cannot take up arms or mount an organized, collective campaign of self-defense.

Please add to count 15 that the treatment of animals is "not in consonance with constitutional values". I ask that the first remedy provided by the Federal Supreme court establishes jurisdiction, freedoms and dignity for land-animals, pollinators, birds and aquatic life, as well as men and women. It must be made clear that we are above corporations and above public servants.

We ask for an end to the slaughter, breeding, engineering, confinement, isolation, force-feeding, intensive keep, Halal or other methods of killing, hunting, testing, vivisection, dissection, poisoning, experimentation, modifying, enhancing, neglecting, gene editing, consuming or selling of animal-based ingredients. 

We ask the court to formally recognize the substantial equivalence of the "live export" of farm animals to countries where they are not protected by any laws, to the displacement and replacement of whole human populations to nations where they hold no legal status and no recourse to protection. 

Contesting Patent Court Decisions
Thousands of patents have been allowed that should not have been allowed. The jurisdiction, bodily integrity, privacy, rights and dignity of de jure men and women and all natural creations have been over-ridden by the patent laws and patent courts. 

We rigorously contest the legality of patenting 'Exclusive Rights to the Computerization of the Human Body' and all  energy generated there-from, by Bill Gates. 

We strongly contest the Wolbachia IP Technology coupled with Microsoft CNN AI patented by Scott O'Neill of the World Mosquito Program, which claims exclusive rights to all digital equipment - including the mosquitoes themselves and all data generated. The patent has apparently meant that the implementers have not had to disclose the presence of the surveillance technology in the mosquitoes, or accept liability for the mass deployment of novel biological organisms. 

We strongly contest the legal basis for private patenting of pharmaceutical, military, agriculture, pesticide, or conservation products, when the research and trials for those products have been justified and funded by the public. This is particularly of concern with 'dual function' research of concern, where biological agents and their gene sequences are withheld in case they are misused. It is the military and pharmaceutical companies themselves that have weaponized technology. The patents ensure that no independent testing of safety, efficacy or spread are possible.

 The Covid 19 vaccines were the first ever drugs to be allowed on to the market without their active ingredients being in the public domain.

We strongly contest the genetic modification of any animal or plant-life and demand compensation in all countries for the contamination of their food and water supply, and degraded quality of life, as a result 

Permanent Suspension.
Requested remedy of the court - Suspend the use of chemical, synthetic and engineered products. 

We anticipate compensation that will support tillage and horticultural food producers and larger land owners in making their land more productive, with orchards  and mixed crops. It will provide a return to the principle that food is medicine. This is a process used by the Organic Trust and other Organic Agriculture regulators: The principle is that it takes just six years once the synthetic and chemical products are stopped, for their residue to disappear fully from the soil.

During the six years, labeling can reflect this transition and subsidies support the purchase of 'heritage' seeds while treated, patented and gene edited seeds are taken out of circulation, and heirloom varieties,  biodiversity and soil fertility are restored. 

 Intensive farms will have to be de-commissioned and herds rehomed for the remainder of their lives.

We need the court to insist on an immediate ban on the use of chemicals and novel technologies. 

Proposed Biobanks
Please emphasize that the people do not consent to the collection of genetic samples, of blood or other bodily fluids for replication.

We would appreciate a definitive decision from your honourable court, against a Universal Patent Court in France; A universal patent court is proposed, instead of legal proceedings remaining in their individual nations within Europe, retaining their own patent court and protecting the intellectual property, research, creativity and inventions of their own people. We hope the appeal will  clarify if the patent courts are Common Law courts, as the paperwork suggests. Will this give patent-holders both private and corporate  exemption from liability for their products? Will patents on not-for-profit products be protected? 

Partial Remedy - One Health Experiment's Control Group
So far, there has been no control group for any of the experimental permits awarded. Even the placeboes in vaccine trials have contained the majority of active ingredients of the actual vaccine administered to the other trial group.

If Member States can only get a partial remedy, it would be to be awarded the role, by your honourable court, of the experiment's "Control Group".
Instead of 'An absolute non-questionable leadership in all health matters" being forced on the whole world. The experiment could be conducted on the UN Headquarters in Switzerland and the United States, as both nations are keen to have it. 

All the other member states will live by their national constitutions and record their nation's return to health and prosperity, in their own terms, using the funds retrieved from the defendants and public funds saved from use for terrorism, by the governments and military that will have to step down. 

This would involve the cease and desist of the aerosol chemical trails deployed by airoplanes, disruptive weather modification, the decommissioning of the surveillance, wifi, smart infrastructure, the seizing of assets from military and fraudulent public servants' control and their disbursement to people. The decommissioning of all laboratories inside and outside educational facilities and a funding criteria, lending criteria, and building permissions be established in line with the new economic strategy developed by Humane Party https://humaneherald.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/calories-and-protein-produced-per-acre-1.pdf and through public banks for localized wealth and ensure people are the beneficiaries of their own nation's resources and their own labour and inspiration.  https://publicbankingalliance.ie/?page_id=90#:~:text=The%20Purpose%20of%20the%20Public,Public%20Banking%20System%20to%20Ireland. 

I bring to your attention the following court proceedings and our calls for a referendum.
1) The New York court decision in 2021 that Chimpanzees are not people. This protected researchers from being required to retire chimpanzees after decades of experimentation, to sanctuaries. Even though the chimpanizee was shown to have a command of language and showed empathy and other observable sentience. Response was that apes cannot contribute to society or suffer legal consequences of their actions.
2) National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) and American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) sued the government for Prop 12 that protected animals, in 2019, claiming Prop 12 violates the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution. They did not win but farmed animals still do not have space to turn around, nuruture their young or see daylight.
3)  6 Mar 2020 The largest foie gras (force-feeding of ducks until their livers explode) producer in Hungary sued Ndgy Mancs Foundation for violating its reputation and for damages.
4) Live Transport of calves to other countries for slaughter outside regulations, or for keeping for veal.
5) Case against the Minister for Agriculture, SImon Coveney, and Queallys 2015; fraud and non compliance in their meat plants.
6) Guinness moved to vegan production from filtering through fish bladders. All Irish hop growers (the base ingredient of Guinness) were allowed to plant their crops and be told less that a week later that Guinness would not buy their crops as there were fewer sales as a result of the lockdown. 
7) Bullfighting was at last outlawed in Spain, only then it came to light that it was subsidized with public money to the tune of millions of euro.
110 million Euro in subsidies from the EU for Bull Fighting
8) All traditional herbs, medicines, supplements, and other products were banned unless they are tested on animals again, even though their safety and efficacy had been established for hundreds of years. Making it impossible to source traditional medicines was orchestrated by the pharmaceutical companies wanting a monopoly on the health market and was severely exacerbated during the pandemic.  
The 'continuum of testing' on established products is an unnecessary cruelty for laboratory's profit.
9) Hare coursing, which is banned because of its cruelty in most countries, is allowed in Ireland. MEP Clare Daly discovered hare coursing has also been subsidized yearly by more than a hundred thousand euro, of Irish tax payers' money. 
10) No welfare provision in Agricultural Minister's Horse Racing Bill, despite considerable pressure to enter some.
11) The crushing alive of one-day -old male chicks (Chick culling) ban in Germany but nowhere else. 
12) Non-compliance in Charles River vivisection laboratories. 600 cats and dogs undergoing the most painful toxicity experiments until they are dead.
13) Super trawlers, banned in Australia, are allowed to fish indiscriminately in Irish Waters. The super trawlers have nets the size of two football pitches, sonar to identify every shoal and catch them, fishing on a Lithuanian quota, but owned by someone in Holland.Boats with freezers that can carry 15 tonnes. No regulation to stop smaller fish are not thrown back dead, creating dead zones with no fish.
14) GMO farmed fish and all other digestive-enzyme-destroying GMO food ingredient has been challenged by the Institute For Responsible Technology.

Compensate the existing animal and other charities to the extent that land recovered from irresponsible technology - GMO foods, productive land wrongly re-zoned for solar, wind and military purposes - to be donated for sanctuaries, with human and animal food production supported in the strategy. 

There has not been the opportunity to participate in court proceedings 
but some possible Constitutional Amendments have been articulated: Democracy Amendment (2015), Equal Rights Amendment 2 (2015), and Abolition Amendment (2016). Having this language in final form provides a very clear goal around which the court  could facilitate a complete recovery of the sanctity of the life. And the Appeal decision could help with the final language needed for the Fiscal Responsibility Amendment

15). A ban (following its 5 year wind down period) on caging female pigs, but only in Australia. Few know that in Ireland and everywhere else most sows live permanently in crates so small that they cannot turn around. They are inseminated where they stand and cannot help their piglets when they arrive - every 4 months. 

The public were able to postpone, briefly, the new factory farms planned. 

16). All public contracts are awarded to corporations, instead of qualified smaller organizations because tenders have a clause that requires that an applicant already manages a budget and contracts of equal size. There is no way for not for profit organizations to expand their charitable offering, if they have been donations-based up until the public contract was tendered. 

17) Two animal welfare organizations were refuse the management of County dog pounds and the contract was awarded to a company who dispose of fallen farm animals and were registered in Riga, Latvia at the biggest animal body parts factory in the world. A newspaper article was allowed, which would have been censored now, and the directors of the company backed out of the contract, demonstrating that the extent of their operation was threatened with exposure.

18. Fur farming has not been banned yet, The most recent country gave a 10 year wind-down period - within which it is anticipated that 50 million more mink will be killed.  Fur Farming Stats and Information - Fur farming is banned across the UK but Ireland still has fur farms as horrific as any from the past. Mink are semi-aquatic wild animals each family holding an average territory of 2.5km of riverbank in the wild. In the farms, they are skinned even when still conscious.

19. A Govegan Poster Campaign contributed to a drop in turkey sales one year but the defendants have hijacked the vegan supply chain and the Impossible Burger, for example, contains over 40 gene-edited ingredients. 

20. The World Health Organization defendants have reported that processed meat is carcinogenic, because of 1. the chemicals involved in processing meat 2.  the antibiotics used in confined farming methods and 3. the chemicals sprayed on the grain and grazing the animals eat. They all find their way into the food chain. Now the WHO's pandemic preparedness agreement condones a constant increase in antibiotic resistance through their genetic engineering of pandemic response pharmaceuticals. We appeal to the honourable court to suspend all activities of the defendants with immediate effect.

21. The 'Kill-counter' website shows that aproximately 200,000 tonnes of animals killed per month - sheep, pigs and cows.
Farm Animal Slaughter Statistics UK

22. Puppy farms raided and exposed in Myshall Carlow were found to have several hundred more bitches than they had licenses to keep. The owner famously is quoted  as saying in response to neglect charges "They don't need eyes to pump out puppies" The local court planned to return his breeding license but there were too many people demonstrating outside the courthouse. 

23. Puppy farmers' profits and neglect were protected by the government when the DSPCA (Society for the protection of animals) had to pay for the dogs they seized at Dublin Airport.

24. New puppy farms have got licenses, including Mayo where the beagles are to be bred purely for use in laboratories.
Charles River Laboratories' Experiments a US company breeds and buys stray animals for a "continuum of product development and tests". We do not consent to the corporations or their practices. 

25. 820,000 animals a year suffer in laboratories in Eire (Ireland). 80% for commercial product testing, not even medical. The Hadwen Trust in Oxford amongst others has developed a complete system, exploiting no animals, that could be made mandatory.
Dr Hadwen Trust offers animal-free, human-relevant research. All trials must cease and desist as a result of this appeal, on animals and on humans, due to the impossibility of 'informed consent'. The infant tecchnology that is being used, has been lobbied as accurate and predictable but it is not. 

26. Conditions for cows at abattoirs have been exposed but we have not had the opportunity to bring court proceedings against the meat industry or individuals. There was a rush of 'rape rack' training advertised on Done Deal where people can pay and practice artificial insemination skills on a suspended cow before she is slaughtered.
Calves are routinely dragged from their mothers before receiving the crucial colostrum for their immune systems, for the dairy industry. This creates another level of antibacterial resistance, as calves must receive them, to be kept alive through pneumonia. 

27. Cows are shown electric-prodded in and then rolled upside down in a form of cat scan tunnel, throats cuts and then thrown still alive onto the floor under another, now hanging up, also still alive, in front of the next one pinned in the tunnel.

A police officer Lyn White reported: Cruelty to animals affects people adversely, too" She recalls that she once attended a domestic when she was with the police. The man had abused the woman. But what stood out for her was that this normally mild mannered man was now working in an abattoir to provide for his family. He loved animals so his hatred for the job grew and grew until it controlled him. Sometimes the price of conformity is too high. In fact, perhaps always.

We appeal to the court to stop these industries, devoid of humanity, from continuing, let alone assuming absolute control over all people as well as animals.

28. Blood Spatter Experiments by the military
Massive animal cruelty and abuse exposed throughout the food, science, entertainment and every other industry, including the use of pigs for the military to tie down and shoot, just to observe blood spatter patterns.

29. COP28 Climate action incongruence. What was not discussed was the monopoly on water or the environmental impact of animal agriculture in regard to water; with up to 15,000 litres of fresh water to produce 1kg of beef. Farmers use three quarters of the world's fresh water. 

We refuse to entertain the promotion of Carbon Capture and Storage. 1) It is so dangerous to upset the other critical processes such as photosynthesis. 2) All living things requite carbon. The COP28 was a warning in plain sight of the plan to restrict people's movement and choices, create a captured market for their own products, and all under the pretext of a climate crisis, PHEIC - a public health emergency of international concern. 

Genetically Modified Round-Up Resistant corn or any other toxic food must be banned as it kills the pollinators, the other plant life, and is present in human and animal cancers. 

If all crops, all unsprayed grown on farms transitioning to organic, were directed to people directly, there would be no shortage and the remainder would feed the recovering animals in a natural system where grazing can be provided year around.

30. We do not consent to the high level deals with America and China to produce meat and dairy for them. Minister Simon Coveney has stepped down recently but must be held to account for his treasonous negotiation of Ireland's resources with the Trans Atlantic Trade Partnership Negotiators.

31. The undervaluing of developing countries' produce has already happened by this same TTP - as the US has just decided that meat must not be labelled as to where it came from so that shoppers cant be biassed. We do not consent. 

There is no differentiation between factory-produced and animal products produced from animals that have seen daylight or even free range or ejoyed any adherence to animal welfare principles.
Ireland, for example, is not allowed to say that their cows are from Ireland anymore. It is another matter of jurisdiction and value on the life and productivity of lliving beings. 

All the recent international trade partnerships and treaties will have to be revoked, if justice is done and the defendants held to account.
32. The Right To Resue sick animals has just been lost in the last two weeks.
 Hsiung’s use of a necessity defense was denied, "a person is permitted to trespass onto private property to aid ailing animals".

A gag order barring him from speaking with the media about the case.

All the member states have had a "gag order" put on us. No other scientific or political enquiry is allowed. Feedom of speech is gone already. 

In the case, "the defendants were able to show that the animals had no value, as understood by agribusiness; therefore their removal could not be shown to be a loss of value to the company." 

I ask the honourable court to ensure the appeal is heard because the consequence of the the defendant's agenda, enshrined in to law by the upcoming treaty and IHR amendments vote will be complete humiliation for all living things: No value, no jurisdiction and no protection.

The defendants are trespassing and intend to overreach their authority. Only one delegate from each member state will be allowed at the Conference of the Parties and every single one of them has been compromised and recruited, with the promise of full control over their nation's budget. All the African countries, the Caribbean, Indonesia and of course Palestine are set to be ruined and bankrupted, so that their abundant natural resources can be mined, at the countries' own expense and risk. 

33. The corporations and international organizations will not back down unless they are required to do so by the Federal Supreme Court. This has been shown time and time again. For example, the Biden administration backed a petition by National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) and American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) filed to oppose Prop 12 an animal welfare bill, and sue the state in 2019. They claimed Prop 12 violates the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution.  https://media.4-paws.org/e/2/c/5/e2c5efd1fd945e77cf49b2894aafe7d2f59cd48e/2a_2019_VP_HU_Translation_of_Public_Benefit_Report.pdf

Thank you, from two advocates 
All rights reserved

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

People love, only Bills Hate

Everyone hates bills. They're stressful, disproportionate, and in recent years we've found out they're fraudulent. Not that we can do anything about that..or can we? 

Last week I went to Geneva to file an Appeal against the World Economic Forum, amongst others, and asked for the whole central bank, credit, usury enslavement system to be challenged, national and personal debts wiped, their assets seized and paid into public banks in each country for return to the people.

So to keep our eyes on the prize, and our expectations high and bright, I thought I'd start sharing the lyrics to our love songs.  

If you want to know more about the case, and for a chance to participate - evidence has gone in from both jurisdictions: from living men and women and also professional, the lawyers and doctors.


 Instinct by Urgent Rougherendum

Instinct Lyrics


Can you? Will you?

Can you really be here now? Not lay claim to all the years to come?

Don't freak out about when and how\

It will be a summer of love, you'll see

What you don't know can hurt you very uch

But if you're true ,t here's a part of you that they can't touch

Skies are clear after the downpour

W'e're right here, its not like before

Showers o lemmings have run their course

Leaving us, who've found our true north


We've been betrayed. We've been waylaid

You will follow your heart

I will act in honour

But most of all I'll follow my instinct 

because my instinct tells me who you really are

and what I'm really for.


The heart can tether can blurt the lines

The mind can tell us lies

But inclination is as good as divination, 

as a guide.


If you wanna be here, be here.

If you wanna go, then go.

But this is the time to act on your hunches.

Time to have some fun.

Open your mind to change,

and change will come.


Can you be here now?

This is the time we've got.

Be here, because I'm here.




Sunday, April 14, 2024

Farm Protest Report: Plants not Panels English and French

 It Is Not The Farmers Crippling Factories.  Let’s do some joined up thinking on the meat industry while we have the chance.


Well done to the farmers for protesting. This sort of demonstration is the only way that change has been affected down the years. I think particularly of slavery; the farmers being the slaves and the traders being the meat factory bosses.


For years these big players have actually been crippling Irish farmers by meeting every Friday to decide how little they are going to pay for animals. Then by taking only one or two animals at a time so farmers have to keep and feed their animals longer than is economically viable. Also, by endless non-compliance in factory machinery – adjusting their weighing and grading machines to give farmers even less again. 


All that is even before the meat plants brought the meat industry into disgrace with their food safety practices, including horse meat contamination, BSE, samples of meat containing 5 species – including rodent. 


So, farmers and all of us have to continue to be brave and let the factories close. But not let the owners slip away with their winnings, without paying redundancy to workers and fines to farmers. We must make sure as well that they don’t monopolize some other profitable and sensitive area next, like live export or water.


I mention water because these meat plants are in charge of some of Ireland’s fresh water aquifers too. They are not managing those well either, hence the recall of the contaminated ‘spring water’. At one stage, a water plant, belonging to a meat plant, was filling their bottles straight from the mains. When they were sent a bill, they got diggers in, created a massive leak, covered it over and refused to pay, claiming it was water lost not water used and sold again by them. 


The point of focusing on the bad practice of meat factories is that in this time of crisis, we can hold them accountable. They can be fined and called upon to sponsor those who have suffered as a result of their dealings.


There is a relationship between meat industry, including the IFA, the chemical giants and pharmaceutical companies who have also taken advantage of farmers, via veterinary and farm spray costs. I have worked with and know of many farmers who have not yet fully paid for feed costs from two winters ago. Also every conventional farmer (and only under 2% in Ireland are organically farmed so that is most farmers), will receive all their bills in the same week that their European grant payment comes in. It only nearly covers their bills. 


Ireland has declared a climate emergency and agreed we need to make radical changes. We need to actually reverse the process of global warming with practices that cool and draw carbon emissions out of the atmosphere. Fining the factories and agriculture chemical companies for damages to farmers would sponsor the farmers in the changes they need to make. 


The power the farmers still have is that they own a lot of land. I suggest they are heralded as heroes and guided to lead the environmental changes. This would be instead of the minister’s idea, which is to leave farmers on income support. That is, without money to even maintain their land or deal with their waste properly or fulfil their responsibility to their animals.


The Department of Agriculture has a great chance here. They can iron out the contradictions in government policy. 

It was not current ministers who negotiated the bright idea of increasing the national herd by 50% by 2020 and agreed to meeting environmental targets simultaneously. It was not current ministers who hid the first whistle blowing case, which was against a meat group. So, with their heads held high and in the light of the current climate, the agriculture department can dip into their records and find ample justification to close the meat and chemical companies down and fine them for damages to farmers and their land. These fines would make a new injection of money, from central players, rather than tax payers who, surprisingly enough, have never made a buck off the exploitation of animals or farmers or Europe. 


It can be paid directly to farmers to support an immediate ceasing of chemical use and to start projects that re-vision the use of their land. Community Supported Agriculture involves families paying a small weekly sum to a farmer, year round, in exchange for goods when they’re in season. And revision the role of animals – Their manure, for example, will be crucial in building soil and the fertility of the land. Bio-digesters can produce free electricity and energy for whole towns. 


Urgent Rougherendum Logo 

Ignorantia juris non excusat




A referendum can be run or poll done on what people are prepared to do and change and eat, to lighten their carbon and water footprint. I have composed such a survey/possible referendum questionnaire and will forward it on request. There is also the 300 pages of evidence against one meat group. However, I will not forward that as a duplicate file is already in the Department of Agriculture. It can now be used, alongside evidence already in the public domain, against the other main players in the meat and agri chemical companies. 


Closing the slaughterhouses might have led to a return to the kinder way of killing animals - on the farm, where they lived. Sadly, our version of a mobile slaughter service, in Ireland, are the ACS, the Animal Collection Service. They are an equally massive organization. Incredibly, they are in receipt of huge public contracts to run our dog and horse pounds. Funded by Irish tax payers’ money, the ACS business is actually registered in Riga, Latvia – the home of the biggest animal body parts factory in Europe. I mention that to flag up the risk of an increased black market in animals, alive and at the carcass stage.


Therefore, I suggest new roles and subsidies for animal care. Stop breeding would be the first. Yet, incentivize the keep and five freedoms of farm animals. Pigs for example are good at aerating the soil and preparing land for new uses. Get them out of the crates. Chicken litter and every other natural woody-waste can be used to make biochar – an old skill and natural charcoal is being utilized in other countries, recognized as capable of permanently drawing out and sealing greenhouse emissions from the atmosphere, improving the condition of animals in feed, fertilizing soil in an accumulative way for nutrient density and natural water filtration. 


Eliminate the contradictions in policy. The farmers lose revenue and their livelihoods at every turn. They are not allowed to sell an animal or eat it, if it has lost an ear tag. If the hay and feed are expensive, due to climate chaos and failed crops, they bear the cost of that. If one in the herd is identified as having TB, however pre-symptomatic, they have to pay for it to be taken away when its carcass is then treated exactly the same when it reaches the factory, as healthy cows. If sheep are killed by dogs, the farmers are not allowed to keep the lamb for their own freezer. They have no recourse to compensation if there is any attack on their animals or even if the factory weighing machines are found to be non-compliant to ‘outside the tolerance level’. 


Compare this to the meat plants who duplicate pallet labels and disrupt traceability. They can lay off staff without notice. They can decide an unfair price for animals that does not cover the cost of rearing them. They can make trades with other countries to profit and somehow are allowed to represent Ireland. This cannot be right. 


When helping raise the food safety issues, it became apparent that that the legal system, policy and big business all exploit the farmers. There is also a strong desire in the meat industry to push the boundaries of what they can get away with. As one farmer announced; ‘The farmers did not cause the horse meat contamination crisis! When we drop our cattle to the factory they are definitely only bovine. After they hit the factory floor, that’s when there is no saying what happens.’


So, I suggest a solution for farmers protesting, is take their side, free them from the control of meat and chemical companies. Use the power of governance and public opinion to support the farmers in protecting their livelihoods, our climate, biodiversity, land, animal welfare and public health. 


Stipulate that farmers unanimously stop using chemicals, antibiotics and enlarging their herd and inevitably their financial/environmental burden. Sponsor them to take up environmentally-guided projects, which will directly and instantly benefit and inform everyone. Let those who have profited too long, from destructive practices and products, bear the cost of the transition phase.


Oh yes and it is obviously a good idea to refuse the Brazil beef deal. No animal products should be allowed into Ireland or indeed Europe that have un-traceable welfare and conditioning practices. 


Meat plants should also not be allowed to kill animals using ‘Halal-approved’ methods. That is just a license for poor slaughter practices, bleeding out and to kill without the cost of stunning them first. 


The import bans should support tillage farmers too. They should not have to compete with imported produce from countries that use chemicals banned for use here. It is not fair. Especially as those countries using recognized toxic chemicals often have warmer weather and earlier, more consistent harvests anyway.


Take the side of farmers and the environment. This is your chance to make Ireland healthy and food independent.

 

En Francais - Machine-translated for the realisation of the vision, via the Federal Supreme Court in Switzerland who accepted our Appeal by hand last week. 

Ce ne sont pas les agriculteurs qui paralysent les usines. Menons une réflexion commune sur l'industrie de la viande pendant que nous en avons l'occasion.

Bravo aux agriculteurs pour leur protestation. Ce type de démonstration est la seule façon dont le changement s’est produit au fil des années. Je pense particulièrement à l'esclavage ; les agriculteurs étant les esclaves et les commerçants les patrons des usines de viande.

Depuis des années, ces grands acteurs paralysent les agriculteurs irlandais en se réunissant tous les vendredis pour décider du montant qu'ils vont accorder à l'achat d'animaux. Ensuite, en ne prenant qu'un ou deux animaux à la fois, de sorte que les agriculteurs doivent garder et nourrir leurs animaux plus

longtemps que ce qui est économiquement viable. En outre, par la non­conformité sans fin des machines des usines – en ajustant leurs machines de pesée et de classement pour donner encore moins aux agriculteurs.

Tout cela se passait avant même que les usines de transformation de la viande ne déshonorent l’industrie de la viande avec leurs pratiques en matière de sécurité alimentaire, y compris celle de la viande de cheval

contamination, ESB, échantillons de viande contenant 5 espèces – dont rongeurs.

Les agriculteurs et nous tous devons donc continuer à faire
preuve de courage et laisser les usines fermer. Mais ne laissez pas le

les propriétaires s'enfuient avec leurs gains, sans licencier les travailleurs ni payer d'amendes aux agriculteurs. Nous devons également nous assurer qu'ils ne monopolisent pas un autre domaine rentable et sensible, comme l'exportation

d'animaux vivants ou l'eau.

Je mentionne l'eau parce que ces usines de viande sont également en charge de certains des aquifères d'eau

douce de l'Irlande. Ils ne les gèrent pas bien non plus, d'où le rappel de « l'eau de source » contaminée. À un moment

donné, une usine d’eau, appartenant à une usine de transformation de viande, remplissait ses bouteilles directement sur le réseau. Lorsqu'ils ont reçu une facture, ils ont fait venir des creuseurs, ont créé une fuite massive, l'ont recouverte et ont refusé de payer, affirmant qu'il s'agissait d'eau perdue et non d'eau utilisée et revendue par eux.

L’intérêt de se concentrer sur les mauvaises pratiques des usines de viande est qu’en cette période de crise, nous


peut les tenir responsables. Ils peuvent être condamnés à une amende et être appelés à parrainer ceux qui ont souffert du fait de leurs
actes.

Il existe une relation entre l'industrie de la viande, y compris l'IFA, les géants de la chimie et les sociétés pharmaceutiques qui ont
également profité des agriculteurs, via les coûts des vétérinaires
et des pulvérisations agricoles. J'ai travaillé avec de nombreux agriculteurs et je connais de nombreux agriculteurs qui n'ont pas encore

entièrement payé leurs coûts d'alimentation animale il y a deux hivers. De plus, tous les agriculteurs conventionnels (et seulement moins de 2 % en Irlande sont issus de l'agriculture biologique, c'est­à­dire la plupart des agriculteurs) recevront toutes leurs factures la même semaine que
le paiement de leur subvention européenne. Celle­ci ne couvre que

presque leurs factures.

L’Irlande a déclaré l’urgence climatique et a convenu que nous devions apporter des changements radicaux. Nous devons réellement inverser le processus de réchauffement climatique grâce à des pratiques qui refroidissent et éliminent les émissions de carbone de l’atmosphère.

Imposer des amendes aux usines et aux entreprises de produits
chimiques agricoles pour les dommages causés aux agriculteurs encouragerait les agriculteurs à apporter les changements dont ils ont besoin.

faire.

Le pouvoir dont disposent encore les agriculteurs réside

dans le fait qu’ils possèdent de grandes quantités de terres.

Je suggère qu’ils soient présentés comme des héros et guidés

pour diriger les changements environnementaux.

Cela irait à l'encontre de l'idée du ministre, qui est de laisser

les agriculteurs bénéficier d'un soutien au revenu. C’est­ à­dire sans argent pour même entretenir leurs terres,

gérer correctement leurs déchets ou assumer leurs responsabilités envers leurs animaux.

Le ministère de l’Agriculture a ici une grande chance.
Ils peuvent aplanir les contradictions de la
politique gouvernementale.
Ce ne sont pas les ministres actuels qui ont négocié l’idée brillante d’augmenter le cheptel national de 50 % d’ici 2020 et qui ont convenu d’atteindre 
simultanément les objectifs environnementaux. Ce ne

sont pas les ministres actuels qui ont caché le premier coup de sifflet

affaire explosive, qui concernait un groupe de viande. Ainsi, la tête haute et à la lumière du climat actuel, le ministère de l'Agriculture peut puiser dans ses dossiers et trouver de nombreuses justifications pour fermer le magasin de viande et de viande. les entreprises chimiques et leur imposent des amendes pour les dommages causés aux agriculteurs et à leurs terres. Ces amendes constitueraient une nouvelle injection d’argent, provenant d’acteurs centraux, plutôt que des contribuables qui, étonnamment, n’ont jamais gagné d’argent grâce à l’exploitation des animaux, des agriculteurs ou de l’Europe.

Il peut être versé directement aux agriculteurs pour les aider à cesser immédiatement l'utilisation de produits chimiques et à lancer des projets visant à réviser l'utilisation de leurs terres. L'agriculture soutenue par la communauté implique que les familles paient une petite somme hebdomadaire à un agriculteur, toute l'année, en échange de marchandises

en saison. Et revoir le rôle des animaux – Leur fumier, par exemple, sera crucial dans la construction des sols et la fertilité des terres. Les biodigesteurs peuvent produire gratuitement de l’électricité et de l’énergie pour des

villes entières.

Un référendum peut être organisé ou un sondage sur ce que les gens sont prêts à faire, à changer et à manger, afin de réduire leur empreinte carbone et eau. J'ai rédigé un tel questionnaire d'enquête/référendum éventuel et je

le transmettrai sur demande. Il y a aussi les 300 pages de preuves contre

un groupe de viande. Cependant, je ne le transmettrai pas, car un dossier en double se trouve déjà au ministère de l'Agriculture. Elle peut désormais être utilisée, aux côtés de preuves déjà tombées dans le domaine public, contre les autres principaux acteurs des secteurs de la viande et de l’agrochimie.

La fermeture des abattoirs aurait pu conduire à un retour à une manière plus douce d'abattre les animaux : à la ferme, là où ils vivaient. Malheureusement, notre version d'un service d'abattage mobile, en Irlande, est l'ACS, l'Animal

Collection Service. Il s’agit d’une organisation tout aussi massive. Étonnamment, ils reçoivent d’énormes
contrats publics pour gérer nos enclos à chiens et à chevaux. Financée par l'argent des contribuables irlandais, l'entreprise ACS est en fait enregistrée à Riga, en Lettonie – qui abrite la plus grande usine de parties de corps d'animaux en

Europe. Je mentionne cela pour signaler le risque d'une augmentation du marché noir des animaux, vivants et carcasses.

Par conséquent, je suggère de nouveaux rôles et subventions pour le soin des animaux. Arrêter la reproduction serait la

première. Pourtant, encouragez le maintien et les cinq

libertés des animaux de ferme. Les porcs, par exemple, sont

doués pour aérer le sol et préparer les terres à de nouveaux usages. Sortez­les des caisses.

La litière de poulet et tous les autres déchets ligneux naturels peuvent être utilisés pour fabriquer du biocharbon – un vieux

Le savoir­faire et le charbon de bois naturel sont utilisés dans d'autres pays, reconnus comme capables d'extraire et de sceller en permanence les émissions de gaz à effet
de serre de l'atmosphère, d'améliorer la condition des animaux nourris, de fertiliser le sol de manière cumulative pour la densité nutritionnelle et la filtration naturelle de l'eau.

Éliminer les contradictions politiques. Les agriculteurs perdent à chaque instant leurs revenus et leurs moyens de subsistance.

Ils ne sont pas autorisés à vendre un animal ou à le manger
s'il a perdu son étiquette auriculaire. Si le foin et les aliments sont chers, en raison du chaos climatique et des mauvaises récoltes, ils en supportent le coût. Si un membre du troupeau est identifié comme atteint de tuberculose, même présymptomatique, il doit payer pour qu'il soit enlevé lorsque
sa carcasse est ensuite traitée exactement de la même manière lorsqu'elle atteint


l'usine, comme des vaches en bonne santé. Si des moutons sont tués par des chiens, les agriculteurs ne sont pas autorisés à conserver l'agneau dans leur propre congélateur. Ils n'ont
aucun recours à une indemnisation en cas d'attaque sur leurs animaux ou même si les balances d'usine s'avèrent

non conformes « en dehors du niveau de tolérance ».

Comparez cela aux usines de viande qui dupliquent les étiquettes des palettes et perturbent la traçabilité. Ils peuvent licencier du personnel sans préavis. Ils peuvent décider d’un prix injuste pour les animaux, qui ne couvre pas le coût de leur élevage. Ils peuvent faire des échanges commerciaux avec d’autres pays pour

en tirer profit et sont autorisés d’une manière ou d’une autre à représenter l’Irlande. Cela ne peut pas être vrai.

En contribuant à soulever les questions de sécurité alimentaire, il est devenu évident que le système juridique, la politique et les grandes entreprises exploitent tous les agriculteurs.
Il existe également une forte volonté dansl’industrie de la viande de repousser les limites de ce qu’elle peut faire. Comme l’a annoncé un agriculteur : "Les agriculteurs n'ont pas causé la viande de cheval crise de contamination ! Quand nous laissons tomber notre bétailà l'usine, ils ne sont définitivement que des bovins.

Une fois qu’ils ont atteint l’usine, on ne peut plus dire ce qui se passe.

Je propose donc une solution aux agriculteurs qui protestent : prendre leur parti, les libérer du contrôle des entreprises de

viande et de produits chimiques. Utiliser le pouvoir de la gouvernance et de l’opinion publique pour soutenir les agriculteurs dans la protection de leurs moyens de subsistance, de notre climat, de la biodiversité, des terres, du bien­être animal et de la santé publique.

Stipuler que les agriculteurs cessent à l’unanimité d’utiliser des produits chimiques, des antibiotiques et d’agrandir leur cheptel et inévitablement leur charge financière/ environnementale. Parrainez­les pour qu'ils

se lancent dans des projets respectueux de l'environnement, qui bénéficieront et informeront directement et instantanément tout le monde. Que ceux qui ont profité
trop longtemps de pratiques et de produits destructeurs supportent le coût de la phase de transition.

Oh oui, et c’est évidemment une bonne idée de refuser l’accord sur la viande bovine brésilienne. Aucun

produit animal ne devrait être autorisé en Irlande ou en fait, l’Europe a des pratiques de bien­être et de conditionnement introuvables.

Les usines de viande ne devraient pas non plus être autorisées à tuer des animaux en utilisant des méthodes « approuvées par Halal ». Il s’agit simplement d’une autorisation pour de mauvaises pratiques d’abattage, de saignée et de mise à

mort sans avoir à les étourdir au préalable.

Les interdictions d’importation devraient également soutenir les agriculteurs qui cultivent le sol. Ils ne devraient pas avoir à

concurrencer les produits importés de pays qui utilisent des produits chimiques interdits ici. Ce n'est pas juste.

D’autant plus que les pays utilisant des produits chimiques toxiques reconnus ont souvent des températures plus chaudes et des

récoltes plus précoces et plus régulières.

Prenez le parti des agriculteurs et de l’environnement.

C’est votre chance de rendre l’Irlande saine et indépendante sur le plan alimentaire.